Jack,
Here is my response to Lorraine's TechNet post of last week. I just realized my post wasn't accepted because my email had changed and my new email wasn't in the LIST Server.
Lorraine,
In my previous company we used lots of IAg boards without difficulty. As part of an IAg evaluation we conducted sodlerability testing after accelerated aging as well as after real storage (i.e., 22 month factory store room storage in Oklahoma City, OK; North Andover, MA; Richmond, VA; and Princeton, NJ). The solderability was good for all of the stored units. My current company also uses IAg boards without any difficulty. A few months ago we found some IAg boards going through our CM's factory that were one year old. Those units soldered fine. We avoid brown paper and rubber bands and anything that might contain sulfur. We typically receive IAg boards shrink wrapped 10 to a package.
Regards,
George
George M. Wenger (908)-546-4531
Reliability Engineer
RF Power Amplifier Group
Andrew Corporation, 40 Technology Drive, NJ 07059
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack C. Olson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 2:54 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Shelf life of Immersion Silver Fabs
At the time I posted that message, I had just finished reading a special
issue of CircuiTree magazine called "The Board Authority" Volume 4 Number 1
titled "Assembly and Solderability" which has at least three articles in it
that discuss silver plating, and the entire IPC email archives of every
post that had the word "silver" in it, and also the White Paper called "PWB
Surface Finishes" available for free at
http://www.ipc.org/html/downloads.htm
In all of those sources the ONLY drawbacks to silver that I can remember
are that it might not be reliable enough (or robust enough) for contact
switches, and that storage may be an issue. Well, I should say those are
the concerns that interested ME, there are also concerns if it comes into
contact with sulfur, different probe tips for ICT, possible incompatibility
with via plugging, stories about whiskers in the olden days, etc... but I
don't consider those as drawbacks to using it. I can't remember who stated
they should be in an airtight bag, but just for the record I have one that
was sitting on my desk exposed for weeks, and is now in a file cabinet
folder (exposed) and still seems just as solderable, but I'm no expert (I'm
a layout guy). I don't even see any evidence of tarnish. Since I can't seem
to find the exact quote that got me worried, I would like to apologize if I
misinterpreted a source and especially for using the term "most sources"
since I can't even find ONE at the moment. sorry...
good luck and best wishes,
Jack
-=original message=-
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 16:34:43 +0100
From: "Reid, Lorraine" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Shelf life of Immersion Silver Fabs
A couple of months ago there was a discussion thread running on the merits
of immersion silver boards. One of the contributors (Jack Olson, I think)
made the comment that -
"Most sources say a silver surface will not be solderable after a month or
so unprotected. (Even in a baggie it will be okay a year later?)"
What are these "sources"? Are there published articles giving guidelines
on how fabs should be packed to maximise shelf-life?
Basically, we've just received some Immersion Silver boards from fab house
which were wrapped in tissue paper then bubble-wrap. Not in sealed bags or
anything. They claim boards should be OK, even though we won't be using
all supplied boards for a few months. They have offered to repackage if we
insist on it. I'm a little concerned, having seen how Immersion Silver
boards can easily tarnish.
I'd be interested to hear what TechNet contributors have to say on this
matter.
Thanks in advance for your replies
Lorraine Reid
Senior Electronics Engineer
Trivirix International
tel. +44 (0)28 9096 0932
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
