TECHNET Archives

May 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Reid, Lorraine" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 23 May 2002 12:40:44 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Can the learned people at Technet please advise on solder acceptance guidelines for D2PAK devices?

Obviously the pair of leads (at what I will call the front edge of the device)  are treated as any leaded device in respect of the acceptability criteria of IPC-A-610, but what should the "plate" at the back be treated as?

We have a situation where the pad design is just undersize for the component to be fitted - if we allow the front leads to overhang their pads, then we would accept this as "toe overhang" which does not violate minimum electrical clearance, but I am unsure as to what set of guidelines best applies to the lead at the rear of the device.

I hope I have explained this OK.

thanks

Lorraine Reid

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2