TECHNET Archives

April 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Landes, Jeff" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 16:46:17 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Hi all,

Historically we've subjected our units to a "power on" 11hr "burn-in" at
125F (prior to final testing).   This burn-in costs very little to perform,
since a hot room is already set up.

There has been talk of discontinuing this practice -- In fact the subject
comes up at least once a year.

Question....  Is it not just good practice to have a unit powered up for a
period of time before shipping it to an end user?   Otherwise it has only a
minute, or so, of history (during test) under power.  Is it not "better than
nothing"?

Any feedback would be appreciated.  What are others doing out there?

Jeff

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search archives at previous postings http://listserv.ipc.org/scripts/wa.exe?S1=technet
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2