TECHNET Archives

April 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:43:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
always had a hard time with distributors and certs. no traceability possible
often. no test data concerning solderability or whatever. customers partly
to blame as price drives the whole thing with no recourse.

moonman
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Carruth" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 2:29 PM
Subject: [TN] Proposed lifting of component date code restrictions


> If manufacturers continue to provide date codes for their products but
> distributors discontinue tracking and segregation by date codes the result
will
> be, mixed date code lots sent to the customer. In many cases assembly
houses
> that use raw components must capture suspect material by date code. In the
event
> of field failures or customer defects resulting in corrective action
> requirements it is usually imperative to know the problem parts date code
to
> cover effectivity. I feel that the date codes application should be
> standardized. I have also seen where we needed to specifically order
certain
> date codes because the later date code product did not function properly
for the
> application.
>
> On the topic of old components verses new components. I have personally
seen
> some pretty old,  nasty components from brokers that appeared to have been
> previously used and some that were so oxidized that the leads were nearly
black.
> So the solderability of 3 or more year old components is a concern. Date
codes
> need to be standardized and tracked to ensure product quality and
> accountability.
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard Carruth
> Quality Engineer
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]:
SET Technet NOMAIL
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2