TECHNET Archives

April 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kari Rambo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:27:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
The paper is not suggesting that date codes be eliminated; only that
restrictions not be put on components with respect to date codes. For
example, many companies have policies stating if the date code indicates
components are more than a year old, the component must be rejected. The
white paper suggests that because of the advances in manufacturing and
storing the components, they don't "get old" anymore,  and that the date
code doesn't really indicate the age of the component anyway (since the
coding is not standardized). For these reasons, it is suggested that date
code restrictions should not be placed on components.

I don't believe the paper is implying that traceability could also be
eliminated.
(If it is, they're nuts).

kjr
-----Original Message-----
From:   Bloomquist, Ken [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   Tuesday, April 30, 2002 8:13 AM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        Re: [TN] Proposed lifting of component date code restrictions

I wonder how long it would take the component manufacturers to start
marking
date codes again if a problem was found within a part and they either had
to
test everything they had to sort out the problem and throw everything away
and start over? I agree that having the suppliers sort for date codes
because of assumed solderability problems is a problem but there really
needs to be a date code.

KennyB
 << File: ATT00007.html >>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2