TECHNET Archives

April 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rob Legg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 12 Apr 2002 16:46:14 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (78 lines)
They may be using the track resistance as a low cost current sensing
element, in which case, ensuring that it meets intended tolerances only
makes sense.

A large fall-out tells the designers that they've got a problem that may
need attention - especially if it does have cost implications. Let them know
it.

Rob Legg
[log in to unmask]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Vischulis" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:48 AM
Subject: [TN] Interesting question


> Techies:
>
> I received the following email today, and it aroused my curiosity.  What
> reasons exist for specifying dc track resistance when minimum resistance
is
> governed by a combination of copper weight and design width, and track
> length?  Is this a case of over zealous specification or is there a
purpose
> behind adding another test requirement to a product with extensive
> specifications?
>
> Don Vischulis
>
> Original message:
> You may be able to help me, as I would
> like to know why - in addition to specifying
> impedance - an increasing number of PCB designers
> and PCB fabricators are also specifying DC resistance
> of PCB tracks?
>
> I have had an increasing number of clients ask
> me about series resistance being specified on
> PCB tracks, but no one seems to know why..
>
> If you are able to help with some of the reasons
> why, I would very much appreciate hearing from you.
>
>
> Kind regards
> Martyn Gaudion
> www.polarinstruments.com
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]:
SET Technet NOMAIL
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2