TECHNET Archives

April 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 10 Apr 2002 08:37:45 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (116 lines)
Hi, Mary,

The tests types and levels you use have to be designed to reflect what the
product will meet in operation, as you know. I am concerned about one of
your questions, though - "Which is more efficient [at detecting solder
joint related failures]?"

My immediate impression was that you're trying to induce solder joint
failures rather than weed out weak joints. Vibration failure modes are
different from Thermal failure modes, so you can't do more of one test and
less of the other to prove whether or not solder joints are reliable. If
the product is to operate in a particular environment, which includes
vibration and temperature cycling, then you have to do both tests in
appropriate proportions and to appropriate levels.

Remember, you're trying to get your product to pass tests that prove them
suitable for their work. You're not trying to determine the conditions that
will break your product.

The sequence in which you conduct the tests is also important, especially
if you cannot conduct them concurrently as in a thermal cycling chamber
with built-in vibration table.

I will have to leave it to others to suggest how to correlate tests and
test results with operational conditions and working life, and that's not
in my knowledge base yet.

Peter




                    Mary Lin
                    <mary2001@ROA        To:     [log in to unmask]
                    DFLY.ORG>            cc:     (bcc: DUNCAN Peter/Asst Prin Engr/ST
                    Sent by:             Aero/ST Group)
                    TechNet              Subject:     [TN] test method to detect solder
                    <[log in to unmask]        joint weakness
                    ORG>


                    04/10/02
                    12:53 AM
                    Please
                    respond to
                    "TechNet
                    E-Mail
                    Forum.";
                    Please
                    respond to
                    Mary Lin






Hello-

As we know both thermal cycling test and RS vibration test in HALT (Highly
Accerlated Life Test) are effective in detecting solder joint related
failures.
Right now we are in the process of developing HASS profile, can someone
help
me on fllowing questions?

(1)Which test is more efficient, thermal cycling or RS Vibration?
(2) how to correlate number of cycles of test (either thermal cycling or
vibration) with service time in the field application?

Thanks for your time.

Mary
_________________________________________________________________________

Live, laugh, and chat with friends about BMWs, Porsches, Jaguars and the
new MINI
             at The World's Largest Auto Enthusiast Site
                      http://www.roadfly.org/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]:
SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/scripts/wa.exe?S1=technet
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------





[This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete it and notify us immediately; you should
not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other
person. Thank you.]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2