TECHNET Archives

April 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Romero, David [MMI/BOU]" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 9 Apr 2002 12:33:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
Like most engineering answers.  It depends.

I would be more inclined to use vibration if the product will be subjected
to vibration in the field.  Same goes for temperature.  Also it depends on
the product.  If you have a board of high-profile, massive components, then
vibration might be a good choice.  But, if your product has an unreliable
manufacturing process with only SMT components then temperature cycling
might be the best bet.  Also, the chamber should be able to cause the
thermal rates of change necessary to cause the stress necessary to induce
the failures.

Just some things to think about.

Good Luck

-----Original Message-----
From:   Mary Lin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:53 AM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        [TN] test method to detect solder joint weakness

Hello-

As we know both thermal cycling test and RS vibration test in HALT (Highly
Accerlated Life Test) are effective in detecting solder joint related
failures.
Right now we are in the process of developing HASS profile, can someone help
me on fllowing questions?

(1)Which test is more efficient, thermal cycling or RS Vibration?
(2) how to correlate number of cycles of test (either thermal cycling or
vibration) with service time in the field application?

Thanks for your time.

Mary
_________________________________________________________________________

Live, laugh, and chat with friends about BMWs, Porsches, Jaguars and the new
MINI
             at The World's Largest Auto Enthusiast Site
                      http://www.roadfly.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/scripts/wa.exe?S1=technet
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/scripts/wa.exe?S1=technet
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2