 
| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 15 Apr 2002 10:44:14 +0200 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Earl,
I used to use all I could get, compared to IPC guidelines, looked at 1:1
print until my eyes burned, looked whatīs practical for the PCB-folks did
some trimming here and there and than gave it a go.
Always considered the means we had to work on the parts, it makes no sense
to design for just only a superduper-high-tech-future-assembly, it should
work here and in any other place with the same or better standards.
We had the most trouble in believing that QFP80 is QFP80 is QFP80 ....
.. and in the end īt wasnīt actually that much trouble for CAD to contact me
(or assembly) for new parts as was first believed...
Bet you know what works best
Wolfgang
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
