DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

April 2002

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
DesignerCouncil <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Mary Sugden <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:06:59 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"(Designers Council Forum)" <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
There is an old rule of thumb regarding the mechanical support
needed for printed circuit boards/assemblies.  For polymer
based materials (epoxies) the minimum spacing between
mounting posts, bosses, connecting tabs, etc. is calculated as
the board thickness multiplied by 50.

Example, for a .062" thick board....062" x 50 = 3.1".
That is, there should be some form of mechancial
support every 3.1" minimum.  If you are panelizing for assembly,
the same rule applies for the connecting tabs (webs).

Typical examples:       Board                     Minumum  Mechanical
                               Thickness   x50  =         Support Spacing
                                  .020"                                 1.00"

                                  .031"                                 1.55"
                                  .062"                                 3.10"
                                  .093"                                 4.65
                                  .125"                                 6.25

This is an excellent subject to discuss at this time.  For years we
have been spoiled rotten by the excellent mechanical characteristics
of the .062" conventional  boards.  Now with the thinner boards, we are
experiencing a whole new set of failure modes with surface mount parts
and the thinner  boards.  Surface mount often precludes the use of
stiffeners because of the need to stencil the solderpaste.  As a result,
solder joint fatigue and component cracking are far too common.

Hope this helps.

Mary Sugden
[log in to unmask]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To set a vacation stop for delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2