 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:42:52 -0600 |
| Content-Type: | multipart/mixed |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Couldn't you take the BGA and the heatsink loose and perform this test? If you could think of a manner in which to hold the BGA when trying to pull the heat sink off then you wouldn't have to play with a soldered BGA. Word of warning about the load cell of the torque tester, I had done some testing where we were testing the sheer strength of SMT adhesives and used a torque tester. We blew the load cell of the tester by over stressing the tester beyond the max limits. It turned out to be an expensive sheer test.
Kathy
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2713.1100" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN-TOP: 2px; FONT: 10pt MS Sans Serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px">
<DIV>Couldn't you take the BGA and the heatsink loose and perform this test? If
you could think of a manner in which to hold the BGA when trying to pull the
heat sink off then you wouldn't have to play with a soldered BGA. Word of
warning about the load cell of the torque tester, I had done some testing where
we were testing the sheer strength of SMT adhesives and used a torque
tester. We blew the load cell of the tester by over stressing the tester
beyond the max limits. It turned out to be an expensive sheer test.
</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Kathy</DIV></BODY></HTML>
|
|
|
