LEADFREE Archives

March 2002

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:31:36 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
Gordon

I feel that if someone has done his homework and gone leadfree, he's
hardly likely to have 2 production lines for the same product. The
incremental operational savings by staying with 63/37 when he is also
using lead free are hardly likely, IMHO, to be significant (probably
negative), after deduction of the amortisation of the incremental
capital costs. And think of the nightmare of servicing, with potential
mix-ups between the two types.

Brian

"Davy, Gordon" wrote:
>
> Making the switch to leadfree electronic products (or nearly leadfree, as
> the RoHS draft directive has some exemptions) is costing a lot of companies
> a lot of money. It appears that most of the money is of the non-recurring
> variety, that is, figuring out what to do and investing in equipment to do
> it. Is it possible yet to estimate the additional recurring (non-amortized)
> costs of building a product leadfree? Out of necessity auto manufacturers
> produce versions of their cars with the steering wheel on the left and on
> the right. The situation is different for electronic products, but with
> sufficient economic incentive, might some manufacturers decide to produce a
> leadfree version for Europe and a leaded version for elsewhere? Also, if two
> versions of a particular product were to be commercially available, would
> European customs inspectors be able to keep the citizens of their countries
> from buying the leaded version, and for how long?
>
> Gordon Davy
> Baltimore, MD
> [log in to unmask]
> 410-993-7399
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Leadfee Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
> To temporarily stop delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leadfee Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2