TECHNET Archives

February 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Abrahamson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:35:41 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (64 lines)
Fellow Technetters,

One major benefit of solder paste printing for BGA rework is simply to
maintain control of the flux volume that is used.  When rework operators are
working with no-clean Tak flux, it is harder to control- even with a
pneumatic dispensor.  I would say 95% of the time more flux is used in the
tac flux process as compared to the solder paste process.
The solder paste process is great for flux control on sensitive no-clean
assemblies such as for RF applications, but for speed and efficiency- and
water solable rework which will see a post rework cleaning step- the tak
flux process is surely a more cost effective solution.

Steve A
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Ferry [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday,January 31,2002 9:54 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      [TN] BGA Rework Using Paste vs. No Paste
>
> Fellow TechNetters,
>
> We nearly always apply solder paste to the circuit board when we replace
> BGA components during rework. Yet, after speaking with a handfull of BGA
> equipment companies at APEX, seems like they all recommend using flux only
> vs. paste, unless the circuit board is used in a high rel application.
>
> What do ya'all do/recommend for BAG rework? Can you point me to any
> studies/reports on the subject?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff Ferry
> CEO
> Circuit Technology Center, Inc.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]:
> SET Technet NOMAIL
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
> E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> ext.5315
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2