TECHNET Archives

February 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Bell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:44:46 +1300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
Jim,

Not really an answer, but I am curious to this directive???  Do you have any
idea why the Air Force would disallow such no-clean products.  I would have
thought it was more of an issue that some contractors are applying very
aggressive rosin based fluxes to their boards, to the point of having to
clean the residues off.  I am a firm believer in no-clean products, I have
always used no-clean wave solder fluxes, and re-work fluxes, and I would
never even consider using fluxes that require cleaning.  Our process window
fits the no-clean directive, and I am experiencing perfect solder results.
Surely, the situation of applying possibly corrosive fluxes to a board and
then having to clean these boards would pose more of a threat to
military/air force applications????

Curious,

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, 27 February 2002 07:51
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] No No-clean?


Jim Jenkins nervously writes:

I was just approached by one of our engineers whose customer told her that
the Air Force has issued a directive disallowing the use of no-clean fluxes
on any of their hardware.  The customer is flowing down that requirement to
us.  Do any of you know of this directive or what they could be referring
to?

Doug Pauls, ever calm and collected, responds.

Jim, this is the first I have heard of anything along these lines and we
build LOTS of stuff for the Air Force.  On the other hand, we clean our
hardware, so they may not feel the need to talk to us on this issue.  I
would think that levying such a requirement on *existing* hardware would be
next to impossible since you affect thousands of contracts.  You might want
to determine if this is a requirement for NEW designs.  Since many
companies do manufactur hi-rel equipment with no-clean processes, I would
be curious as to the technical rationale for such a requirement.

Doug Pauls
Rockwell Collins

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET
Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2