TECHNET Archives

February 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rob Legg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:06:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
My prod floor used to HALT specific models (scrap) without warning, to
confirm process. Repeating material/process related quality, off the line
occasionally, makes sense.

Doing full/combined  test on fewer numbers is more effective.

RL

----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Christison <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 8:10 AM
Subject: [TN] Environmental Testing - parallel vs. sequential


> Fellow Technetters,
>
> I'm in the middle of a 'frank and forthright' discussion at the moment on
whether it is possible to justify substituting a set of environmental
> tests carried out in parallel on a device i.e.. 10 devices go through
vibration, another 10 go through high temp operating etc... for a customer
> requirement for sequential testing i.e. take 10 devices and put them
through all the tests.
>
> I'm of the opinion that even if you up the severity of each parallel test
it still isn't the same as a sequential test because you won't catch the
> failure mechanisms that results from a combination of effects e.g.. high
humidity weakening an adhesive joint which then fails the shock test. You
> wouldn't see a failure if you tested 10 devices for high humidity and
another 10 for shock.
>
> I'd be interested in some opinions or some literature references which
discuss this issue.
>
> Regards,
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]:
SET Technet NOMAIL
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2