 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:59:23 -0600 |
| Content-Type: | multipart/mixed |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Well,
I had posted a question earlier this week and Steve was kind enough to post 3 photo's on his website titled delam 1, 2, and 3.
I have had the PCB in question cross sectioned and found out what it isn't. It isn't delam, blistering, pink ring, or haloing. We don't have a definitive answer except the PCB meets all of the requirements and there has been no notable reduction in reliability.
Thanks to all who responded and all who gave me some really good places to look and learn more about this topic.
Kathy
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2712.300" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN-TOP: 2px; FONT: 10pt MS Sans Serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px">
<DIV>Well, </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I had posted a question earlier this week and Steve was kind enough to post
3 photo's on his website titled delam 1, 2, and 3. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I have had the PCB in question cross sectioned and found out what it
isn't. It isn't delam, blistering, pink ring, or haloing. We don't
have a definitive answer except the PCB meets all of the requirements and there
has been no notable reduction in reliability. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Thanks to all who responded and all who gave me some really good places to
look and learn more about this topic. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Kathy </DIV></BODY></HTML>
|
|
|
