TECHNET Archives

January 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"<Peter George Duncan>" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:58:33 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (103 lines)
I'm going to add my 2 cents worth about ISO certification, which is opinion
only and may not seem very positive to some folks.

My perception of the whole ISO 9000 thang is that it's a good idea in
theory, but in practice is expensive to implement and not a Standard at
all. The basic premise of the certification is that a Company must have
procedures in place and follow them. That can mean anything or nothing.
What procedures a company should have, what they should contain as a
minimum and how they're implemented and integrated is left to the Company
itself.

I have found also that across different countries the interpretation and
application of the ISO varies, as does the "quality" of the audits carried
out to check compliance. The ISO certificate is thus no indication at all
of the actual qualification level of the holder, and, to me, has come to
mean nothing at all in terms of any supplier assurance. I have had some
truly excellent suppliers with the same certification as some truly awful
ones, so my reaction is, why go to the expense of getting this
certification, as IMHO it's not worth the paper it's written on. It tells
me nothing I can rely on about the company itself.

I haven't seen the new 9000:2000 Standard to compare it with the old one,
but I hope the additional "Shall's" cited by Earl address some of the many
weaknesses of its predecessor. I accept completely Brian's argument that
adoption of too many Standards only serve to bind a Company too tightly to
rules and regs, and not allow it enough space to breathe and evolve. On the
other hand, some sort of demonstrable qualification is needed to
differentiate between well organised suppliers and those with no proper
structure at all. The ISO qualification must be meaningful to be worth the
expense of going for.

Peter Duncan




                    Earl Moon
                    <[log in to unmask]        To:     [log in to unmask]
                    M.COM>               cc:     (bcc: DUNCAN Peter/Asst Prin Engr/ST
                    Sent by:             Aero/ST Group)
                    TechNet              Subject:     Re: [TN] DFM/CE AND ISO 9000/2000
                    <[log in to unmask]
                    ORG>


                    01/02/02
                    01:27 AM
                    Please
                    respond to
                    "TechNet
                    E-Mail
                    Forum."






Pardon me, but good point Edward. I mean trust just goes so far. Also,
imagine the impact a non-calibrated whatever has on product quality.

Knowing calibration requirements are met, as concurrently agreed in
accordance with whatever guideline, provides positive input to the DFM/CE
process and how well the design meets specified requirements. This all gets
back to process control/management effectiveness and how it directly
correlates with design and process compatibility.

Earl

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------





[This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete it and notify us immediately; you should
not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other
person. Thank you.]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2