TECHNET Archives

January 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Graham Collins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:19:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
Ed
If they do change to no-clean, please give me a name so I know who not to use!!!  :-)

Seriously, I'd have some serious issues with this.  There is no way they can know what the end use of the part is - unless they ask each time and tailor the process to fit.  So someone might end up  with a big hidden problem.  Potentially the end user has a no-clean residue in an application that won't tolerate it, or they process the board with a wash and they end up with a mystery residue (as has been discussed on TechNet previously).

I have to ask though, can they process them fast enough that they aren't worried about moisture from the air?  

Doesn't sound like a great plan to me...

regards

Graham Collins
Process Engineer, 
Northrop Grumman
Atlantic Facility of Litton Systems Canada
(902) 873-2000 ext 6215

>>> [log in to unmask] 01/31/02 01:22PM >>>
Hi all,

I've found this thread to be very interesting and informative, but would like to present a "different twist" to the subject:

I have a client using our Reballing system to recondition all sorts of BGA and uBGA for re-use after de-soldering. They are currently using a water soluble paste and cleaning with DI, however the residual absorbed moisture presents a concern, so the devices are baked after cleaning. This increases turnaround time, so they are considering moving to a no-clean process. 

My opinion is that there will be residues and they could possibly be incompatible with subsequent platforms utilized by the end user, as well as creating aesthetic impact. Cleaning alternatives for no-clean fluxes rival the more aggressive (therefore more forgiving) water solubles, so the benefit is lost if cleaned.

Any and all opinions, theories, suggestions and experiences are welcomed!
 
Regards,

Ed Popielarski
QTA Machine
10 Mc Laren, Ste D
Irvine, Ca. 92618

Phone:949-581-6601
Fax: 949-581-2448
Cel: 949-337-2578

www.QTA.NET

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2