TECHNET Archives

January 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:08:04 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Dan,

I did a job last year in the Boston area doing some DC and RF board
combinations on the same structure. Two of the boards had "designed in"
inductors. We too had the concern.

Worked with the folks at the old Hadco, now Sanmina, and found we had to pay
a bit more at first. What really did it for us was negotiating a contract
saying that whatever acceptable inductor was found, we would only order
production quantities if the same process was used.

600 said/says something to the effect that trace width reductions below 20%,
including pits, scratches, dents, etc., shall not be acceptable. No matter,
that number or half of it won't do it for printed inductors. Anyway we
worked with the supplier and a very good process engineer (Ara Kharajian  - Sanmina Tech
East Haverhill
(978-556-6327)/([log in to unmask])and worked out the requirements.


Earl

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2