TECHNET Archives

January 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Flux residue with a no-clean process
From:
Kathy Kuhlow <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 08:19:46 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (304 bytes) , TEXT.htm (672 bytes) 
IPC-610 has no-clean residues as acceptable.  Is it possible that flux may have been mixed with a washable?  Washing a no-clean off is more detrimental than leaving it alone.  

Is the assembly conformally coated?  Is the application intended to be in a wet or high humidity/moisture enviroment?

Kathy 




<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2712.300" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="MARGIN-TOP: 2px; FONT: 10pt MS Sans Serif; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px">
<DIV>IPC-610 has no-clean residues as acceptable.&nbsp; Is it possible that flux
may have been mixed with a washable?&nbsp; Washing a no-clean off is more
detrimental than leaving it alone.&nbsp; </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Is the assembly conformally coated?&nbsp; Is the application intended to be
in a wet or high humidity/moisture enviroment?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Kathy </DIV></BODY></HTML>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2