TECHNET Archives

January 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Marsico, James" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 08:04:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Good day Technet.

Once again, we're considering changing from military workmanship
specifications (MIL-STD-2000) to industry standards (IPC).  The question:
Do both 001 and 610 need to be referenced in our quality manuals and on our
drawings?  Could either be stand-alone?  If acceptability requirements are
in 001, why have 610?

Thanks for your continued help,

Jim Marsico
Senior Engineer
Production Engineering
EDO Electronics Systems Group
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
631-595-5879

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2