TECHNET Archives

December 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"<Rudy Sedlak>" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 09:55:24 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
When you suggest that the ammonium sulfate etchant is the "best" for Tin, you
have to watch your definition of "best", as most people would much prefer to
put on more Tin, and be able to etch faster.

Because most people are in a situation where they can return spent etchant,
and they want the speed, the sulfate based etchant is virtually unheard of in
the world.

I am not familiar with anyone using this etchant anymore, but I also am not
aware of what most of the east coast of the US is doing.

Rudy Sedlak

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2