TECHNET Archives

December 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Sat, 8 Dec 2001 17:45:23 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Hi Roger,
Thicker copper deposits have indeed greater (but not better) elongation
values than thinner deposits. This, however, does not mean that thinner
deposits have less ductility; the lower elongation value is an artifact of
using a test method which is inappropriate for sample geometries like plated
copper foils. Elongation tests work well for specimen for circular and square
cross-section; foil specimen have a cross-sectional aspect ratio of 500 to
1000, which creates this type of artifact.
This is the reason test methods specific for foils (ASTM E 796 "Standard Test
Method for Ductility Testing of Metallic Foil," IPC-TM-650, TM 2.4.2.1
"Flexural Fatigue and Ductility, Foil" ) were developed. These test methods
show there is no difference in ductility for thin or thick foils from the
same batch.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2