TECHNET Archives

December 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"<Rudy Sedlak>" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:32:47 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
As a vendor/supplier to the PCB fabricator industry, I may have some insight,
but since I do not actually build boards, I lack full understanding.

The ENIG process is the most nightmare process in making bare PCB's.

The ENIG process is unreliable, often producing rejects, at virtually the
last step in the process, thus costing $$$$.  It is run at VERY high
temperatures, and is a nightmare to waste treat spent chemicals.  (Other than
that, there is nothing wrong with it....:-)

This is ESPECIALLY  true, if you hold the fabricator to tight specs on Nickle
thickness.

If I were building boards, I would discount hugely for any full immersion
process, like Tin or Silver, over ENIG.

Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical Company

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2