TECHNET Archives

October 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Guenter Grossmann <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 08:48:25 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Bev

I couldn't give you a number. From the metallurgical side some nm are enough because then the solder and the substrate have alloyed. The problem is the maximum. From my feelings I would say that a thick IMC is not optimal for reliability. However, I have no facts and Werner pointed out that a thick IMC doesn't do any bad to reliability. On these inputs I would say that it is important to have an IMC because it is the indicator for a successful alloying of solder and substrate. The thickness seems to be not so important.
If I find some founds left over in LEADFREE by mid 2002 I will make some trials on that.


Best regards

Guenter

Guenter Grossmann

Swiss Federal Institute for Materials Testing and Research EMPA
Centre for Reliability
8600 Duebendorf
Switzerland

Phone: xx41 1 823 4279
Fax :      xx41 1823 4054
mail:     [log in to unmask]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2