Good to see from you again Wolfgang and thanks for the support concerning my
confusion on this subject. The whole subject certainly demands responsible,
well educated, knowledgeable scientists go forward studying and writing
about findings. It's, as you said, maybe going by just a little to fast for
a simple PERSON, like myself though that doesn't make a hill of beans to most.

Really was hoping to see more from Guenter on this subject. I know how busy
he is but he dropped this little bomb on some of us. Maybe, again as you
said, the whole process is so forgiving, we need not be so concerned, or
not. 5,000 years and not a single failure!

Can't get over the glass brush thing though. Must be someone else having an
issue or, for greater input, using them as required (as clearly indicated in
clearly defined procedures) - whatever that means. Do we use it how, when,
where, etc. and what is the acceptance criteria when finished - real thin
solder layer, some exposed copper, etc.? It must be in 001. That's where
I'll start.

Earl

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------