TECHNET Archives

October 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Marsico, James" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 12:53:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (120 lines)
Well, yes, this is a MIL program, and you are correct, either one
temperature or the other, not both.  The top assembly design incorporates a
housing with microelectronics in a hermetically sealed compartment AND the
SMT assembly in a non-hermetic compartment.  The hermetic side is, in fact,
a hybrid which must meet the 883 screening, the SMT assembly just goes along
for the ride.  The SMT assembly needs to remain installed so the unit can be
tested during burn-in.  I guess Werner answered my question regarding the
effects to the PWB assembly if exposed to these conditions.   BTW, the board
will be fabricated with two .010" planes, either CIC or CMC.  I don't think
that this would be an issue either.

Jim Marsico
Senior Engineer
Production Engineering
EDO Electronics Systems Group
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 
631-595-5879



        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Misner, Bruce [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        Sent:   Tuesday, October 16, 2001 12:22 PM
        To:     [log in to unmask]
        Subject:        Re: [TN] PWB ASSEMBLY BURN-IN TEST

        Jim,

        Those burn-ins are typical for Military grade microelectronic
devices (one
        time and temp or the other, not one followed by the other) per Mil
Std 883.
        Could this SMT assembly be for the military and have a number of
flip chip,
        COB or chip scale devices that are driving your customer in that
direction?
        Could they believe that this is more like a multichip module on
laminate
        (MCM-L) rather than an SMT assembly and hence 883 is more
applicable? Your
        definition and theirs may differ.

        Regards,
        Bruce Misner

        > ----------
        > From:         Marsico, James[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
        > Reply To:     TechNet E-Mail Forum.
        > Sent:         Tuesday, October 16, 2001 7:11 AM
        > To:   [log in to unmask]
        > Subject:      [TN] PWB ASSEMBLY BURN-IN TEST
        >
        > Good day Technet:
        > We're being asked to perform a burn-in test (160 HRS @ 125ºC and
352 HRS @
        > 100ºC) on a surface mount assembly.  I'm sure that the parts can
withstand
        > this environment, but what about the PWB and solder joints?
        >
        > Jim Marsico
        > Senior Engineer
        > Production Engineering
        > EDO Electronics Systems Group
        > [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
        > 631-595-5879
        >
        >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
        > -------
        > Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d
        > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in
        > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
        > To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following
message: SET
        > Technet NOMAIL
        > Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources &
Databases >
        > E-mail Archives
        > Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
        > additional
        > information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700
        > ext.5315
        >
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
        > -------
        >

	
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
        Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d
        To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following
text in
        the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
        To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message:
SET Technet NOMAIL
        Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources &
Databases > E-mail Archives
        Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
        information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5315
	
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2