 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | TechNet E-Mail Forum. |
| Date: | Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:51:58 -0500 |
| Content-Type: | multipart/mixed |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would start by deciding if the process qualification can be done by product or by process. By product would be my choice. I would devise a quality plan that lists the process and also includes customer requirements/expectations. Then from that I would confirm that the process is capable and the operator who perform the task are competent. That is the inputs that ISO-9000:2000 will be looking for. From that I would perform in process checks to prove if the process is correct and still capable. These checks become the outputs for you to judge the process by. Then a quick acknowledgment at the end to say yea or nay to it should be fine. Be careful about processes that can degrade a component's life but not cause a latent failure.
Kathy
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META content="MSHTML 5.00.2919.6307" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style="FONT: 10pt Haettenschweiler; MARGIN-LEFT: 2px; MARGIN-TOP: 2px">
<DIV>I would start by deciding if the process qualification can be done by
product or by process. By product would be my choice. I
would devise a quality plan that lists the process and also includes customer
requirements/expectations. Then from that I would confirm
that the process is capable and the operator who perform the task are
competent. That is the inputs that ISO-9000:2000 will be looking
for. From that I would perform in process checks to prove if the process
is correct and still capable. These checks become the outputs for you to
judge the process by. Then a quick acknowledgment at the end to say yea or
nay to it should be fine. Be careful about processes that can degrade a
component's life but not cause a latent failure. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Kathy </DIV></BODY></HTML>
|
|
|
