TECHNET Archives

September 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:03:39 +1200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (119 lines)
Dorothy,

thanks for the info.  The  main reason for placing and reflowing these shields during the SMD
process is one of cost - the shields are cheap and we can use standard P&P machines.  We tried
looking at things like shield clips, shields that were half etched in the tops so that you can
peel off the tops, removeable lids, shields with a conductive injected material for inner
walls.  All proved to be prohibitively expensive - I'm not sure quite why  - maybe there are
patents on all these things pushing the price up.

We also looked at using a chassis with segregated compartments but the RF guys didnt think
that we could get good shielding this way.

Have you had any experience with conductive adhesive?  Presumably you use a dispensing robot
in line with a P&P machine?  How easy is it to rework the cans after the adhesive has set?

Is there any calculation to work out the maximum hole size that a shield will allow for a
certain frequency?  This product range I think will operate between 66 and 900 MHz.

Finally what do you think of IR rework for RF shields - just get the heat to the tops and let
the shield conduct the heat down to the solder joint?

Thanks again,

Chris Murphy

Jack Crawford wrote:

> >>> <[log in to unmask]> 09/18/01 06:16PM >>>
>
> Chris,
>
> Have you thought of using shield clips or fences or conductive adhesive so
> the shield cover can go on as a final mechanical process? If shield covers
> were a final step then they would not be exposed to high temperatures or be
> sucking heat from all the components under its domain and exposing the rest
> to sometimes excessive heat. What frequency is this assembly going to
> operate at? Can some of the shielding be in the box it is installed in
> rather than on the PCB itself?
>
> As for rework, a nozzle can be made for every shield shape that is
> nonstandard and there are many rework stations that could then remelt or
> remove/replace a shield. Of course you could always get a laser if you got a
> lot of extra money in your back pocket.
>
> Dorothy Lush
>
> > ----------
> > From:         Jack Crawford[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Reply To:     TechNet E-Mail Forum.
> > Sent:         Tuesday, September 18, 2001 9:49 AM
> > To:   [log in to unmask]
> > Subject:      Re: Rework of RF shields
> >
> > >>> Chris Murphy <[log in to unmask]> 09/17/01 11:11PM >>>
> >
> > Hi Technetters,
> >
> > I have got a board covered with SMD RF shields in front of me, ranging
> > in size from 15mm x 15mm to 140mm x 40mm to 70mm square.  The spacing
> > between them is only 1.5mm, and they are up to 12.5mm high.
> >
> > I am working through the many issues with these, such as methods of P&P,
> > board / shield warpage, and how we are going to reflow parts under
> > them.  My question is does anyone know of equipment out there that we
> > can use to rework these shields?  I vaguely recollect seeing a machine
> > that moved a hot air nozzle rapidly around in a rectangular pattern, but
> > I am not sure how effective it will be for larger shields that are
> > spaced so closely together.
> >
> > Is there anyone else doing this type of board, and does anyone have any
> > supplier contacts?
> >
> > Any replies greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Chris Murphy,
> > Production Engineering,
> > Tait Electronics,
> > Christchurch,
> > New Zealand
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------
> > Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> > To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
> > Technet NOMAIL
> > Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
> > E-mail Archives
> > Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> > additional
> > information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> > ext.5315
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2