TECHNET Archives

September 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jack Crawford <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 19 Sep 2001 13:36:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
>>> Earl Moon <[log in to unmask]> 09/19/01 12:24PM >>>

Damn,

Real PCB fab questions. Can this be real. Wish I could remember all I
forgot.

Simple answer is it depends on the processes used to prep surfaces for
subsequent imaging, plating, and etching processes. The thinner the copper
foil, the more chance for the conductor pattern going away - actually never
having had a chance to be created.

Man, never worked with 1/8 oz foil. Worked some with 1/4 and lots with 1/2,
as pretty standard stuff. 1 oz too thick for fine line applications. It's
all a compromize. As a concurrent engineering design type, you need to know
your board shop's process engineering capabilities and how much copper will
be removed before initiating a design. Lot's more but just can't or won't
think about it now.

MoonMan

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2