TECHNET Archives

September 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dorothy M. Lush" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:25:15 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
Eric,

I cannot give you the technical reasons but I can tell you that after
loading "flat padded" parts made of FR4 material that you should probably
find another way. Besides the difficulty/impossibility of inspecting
integrity of the solder joints there is the FR4 material which unless
closely monitored in its assembly loves to warp. Are you making this FR4
material or are you buying it? It will be going through multiple reflows by
the time it has been installed in its final location. How is the coplanarity
after all the reflows? I have had warping of a crystal subassembly with FR4
go 30 mils. What do your customers want?

Dorothy Lush
Manufacturing Engineer

> ----------
> From:         Eric Christison[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Reply To:     TechNet E-Mail Forum.
> Sent:         Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:42 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: Conformal Coating
>
> Expert Technetters!
>
> I'd value your opinions on the following.
>
> My company is starting development of a new microelectronics device that
> will be packaged in a new style of package. The substrate of the package
> will be made from FR4 laminate - maybe 0.30mm thick. The package will have
> two concentric rings of pads laid out something like this:
>
>         _______________________________
>         |  *   *   *   *   *   *   *  |
>         |  *                          |
>         |  *    *   *    *    *    *  |
>         |  *    *             *       |
>         |  *    *   *    *    *    *  |
>         |  *                          |
>         |  *   *   *   *   *   *   *  |
>         |_____________________________|
>
> I would have thought the obvious connection style would be BGA but my
> manufacturing minded colleagues want to use plain flat Ni/Au pads.
>
> Is this an acceptable design or are there issues with reliability, PCB
> population etc?
>
> Your opinions would be welcome.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Eric Christison
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
> Technet NOMAIL
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
> E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> ext.5315
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2