TECHNET Archives

August 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:59:59 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Hi,
I have used both same size pads and different size pads for reflow/wave
soldering and have come to the conclusion that slightly longer pads (0.5 mm)
show advantages on wave soldering compared to reflow.
This is because taller components tend to shield the footprint from the chip
wave which can lead to skipped or open joints. The longer pads help to
capture the solder and lead it into the joint.
If you are wave soldering in-line gull wing devices, then orientate them so
that each footprint/lead goes through the solder wave one after the other.
This will prevent shielding one side of the device. Extra pads at the output
end, known as 'solder thieves' will aid drainage of the molten solder and
help prevent shorts. Orientation of these devices on the reflow side is not
an issue.
My experience also says that reflow soldering inherently gives lower defect
levels so I try to design wave soldering out of the equation. Double sided
reflow and pin in hole reflow help here.
Regards
Eric Dawson

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cathy Killen [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 10 August 2001 13:48
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      [TN] SMT Pads
>
> Hi,
> Is there a difference in SMT pad/land size at the design stage if the PCB
> is
> to be reflowed or wave soldered?
> Cathy Killen
> Training Instructor
> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> An Oasis of Training Excellence
> *       028 38314305
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
> Technet NOMAIL
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
> E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> ext.5315
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2