TECHNET Archives

August 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Busko, Wolfgang" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:43:48 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
Hi Alejandro,
 
are you sure that your design fits the component ?
With similar pitch we a ballsize from 0,60mm to 0,90mm and nominal size
0,75mm for the balls.
Our design looks like:
0,60mm pad diameter (24mil)
0,76mm soldermask opening (30mil)
0,33mm pad-to-via distance (this is measured)
0.64mm via size for 0,3mm finished via diameter (25mil)
there´s no soldermask opening for the via´s defined
 
This may not be the optimum but has caused no trouble yet using 150µm (6mil)
stencil and an aperture reduction of 15%.
 
You might check your design so that it´s not at the limit or your paste
printing.
For the part itself, if it´s in the specified limits, you can´t do anything
(accept taking that into account during design )
 
hope this helps
 
Wolfgang
 
 
 -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Becerra Alejandro [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Gesendet am: Montag, 27. August 2001 23:16
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: [TN] Solder Shorts in PBGA


Hello to All, 
We have had solder short in a PBGA with a pitch of 1.27 mm. 
The short is between one solder ball and an adjacent via pad. 
The problem is only shown in specific date codes of the component. 
We measured the solder balls and there are differences between the diameter
of the solder balls: 
The average diameter in the "good" date codes is 0.58 mm and in the "bad"
date code is 0.63mm. 
The specs. states that the diameter could be between 0.50 and 0.70 mm; then
both date codes are within specs. 
We also found that the soldermask over the via pads is not well centered
causing that solderable surface in some 
via pads be closer to the solder balls. 
Is it possible that the solder short could be caused by the combination of
these two issues? 
Thanks in advance. 



Alejandro Becerra

Quality Assurance

Phone (915) 841-8439, Fax (915) 841-8401

[log in to unmask]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2