TECHNET Archives

August 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Abrahamson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:02:17 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (115 lines)
Yes it is impossible to solder effectively to 30 micro inches of gold.  15
micro inches is also very difficult to solder to.  I believe the voiding
mechanism is refered to as Kirkindall voiding, although I was unable to
confirm this in any of my books.
Not to drift off the point here, but I was not that interested in replying
on this topic as much as I am interested in what the heck Ryan Grant is
doing replying to this topic.

RYAN, you do not show up for work yesterday because your wife is in labor.
Perhaps you might notify your friends at work- heck and even the guys on the
technet about the birth announcement of your child.  I understand the
importance of proper gold thickness and all, but C'MON man.  Was it a boy
and did you name him after me?  Maybe out of respect to the technet and your
colleagues, you should name the child Dilbert, or even APEX.

Steve A

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Grant
> Sent: Monday,August 20,2001 8:49 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: [TN] Solder vs Gold Pads on SMT
>
>  Ken, that is very crafty of your PWB supplier.
>
> It is actually cheaper and easier for them to supply your boards with a 30
> micro inches of gold finish.  You see, you already demand the 30 micro
> inches of gold for your edge fingers, and getting ENIG (which is
> different)
> on the rest of the board means they would have to do two (count them 2)
> different surface finishes.  The extra cost of the gold is practically
> nothing compared to the cost of the chemicals that carry the gold and the
> process cost of applying it.
>
> Do not worry about gold embrittlement.  You will have to get more than 70
> micro inches of gold on the pad before that happens.  Unless, of course,
> you
> are not at reflow temperatures long enough such that the gold does not
> homogeneously distribute itself through the joint.
>
> However, the thick gold may cause soldering problems.  Thick gold has been
> reported by some to cause voids and/or grainy joints.
>
> If it were me, I would tell them NO WAY, do the board right.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Ryan Grant
> Advanced Technology Engineer
> MCMS
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chafin, Ken G.
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: 8/20/01 12:30 PM
> Subject: [TN] Solder vs Gold Pads on SMT
>
> We presently use SMT printed wiring boards with 60/40 tin-lead solder
> finish
> on the pads.
>
> Our PWB supplier has offered to supply our boards with a 30 micron
> electroless gold finish on the pads at the same price.
>
> Does anyone have any views on the relative merits of the two finishes?
> Solderability?  Durability?  Reliability?
>
> We manufacture electronic control and signaling systems for the rail and
> rapid transit industry and our equipment is often in harsh environments.
>
> Thanks for any information on the subject.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
> in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
> Technet NOMAIL
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases
> > E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> ext.5315
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
> Technet NOMAIL
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
> E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> ext.5315
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2