TECHNET Archives

August 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"<Peter George Duncan>" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:48:12 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (87 lines)
I have to partially disagree with John's disagreement. While life is too
short (and expensive) to go around picking up every dropped component,
particularly unidentifiable ones, we have several taped components and
devices that are to expensive to lose in large quantities, either through
fallout or rejection. I gave a short  list to our assembly house of the
components over a certain value and size that they could recover easily and
reliably, and they have taken simple steps to effect this recovery. It has
saved quite a bit, especially on prototype/pre-production runs where the
attrition has been 20 times the actual usage for smaller components.

Regards

Pete Duncan



                    John Brewer
                    <brewerj@SQUA        To:     [log in to unmask]
                    RED.COM>             cc:     (bcc: DUNCAN Peter/Asst Prin Engr/ST Aero/ST Group)
                    Sent by:             Subject:     Re: [TN] Fallout
                    TechNet
                    <[log in to unmask]
                    ORG>


                    08/16/01
                    02:04 AM
                    Please
                    respond to
                    "TechNet
                    E-Mail
                    Forum."






>>"are your operators consciencious about picking up/saving and
>>hand placing dropped parts?"

     Oh man....with all due respect, I'd surely not advise doing this. With
the size
of most SMT parts, the lack of marking, and the relatively cheap cost of
most of them
compared with the cost of diagnose> test> rework> retest, etc, I'd
generally
advise not ever doing this!

     If things are falling off in such quantities so as to make it
economically
feasible to reuse the parts, then the SMT process engineer should
investigate
the root cause and fix it, rather than try and reuse fallout....

     Rgds and good luck!
     John
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=--=-=-=-=-=
John Brewer
Square D Component Engineering
Raleigh NC

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2