TECHNET Archives

August 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Kelly <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:53:11 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
We are manufacturing a flex circuit with the following parameters:
1) pad size opening .004, however ther are .025 pads as well.
2) finish - either immersion gold or white tin
3) covercoats - either a flexible soldermask or polyimide covercoats which
we would laser ablate then plasma clean

My questions are as follows:
1) should I be concerned with immersion gold/electroless nickel with a .004
pad feature
2) any known issues with properly developing off the soldermask - right now
we are leaning towards using a Rogers 8080 flexible mask

After building the flex a device is reflowed onto the flex ( on the .004
pads) .005 solder spheres are placed on the device (63/37 tin lead), the
flex is fluxed with Kester TSF6522, device is placed then re-flowed.

Thank you for your comments,
Regards Steve Kelly

PFC Flexible Circuits Ltd.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2