TECHNET Archives

August 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rich Lasko <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 13 Aug 2001 07:29:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Trying to send again.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Lasko
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 10:18 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      IPC Class 2 vs Class 3 Price Considerations
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> My question is as follows:
>
> What is the industry consensus on price considerations (during quoting)
> for customers that require product inspections to IPC-A-610 Class 2 vs
> customers that require product inspections to IPC-A-610 Class 3?  Is there
> a general multiplier that is used when considering the differences in
> these two product classes?
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rich Lasko
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2