TECHNET Archives

July 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"<Peter George Duncan>" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:44:00 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
Much of the bow and twist these days is down to the choice of material used
for the substrate coupled with 'balance' in the board design and ultimately
on the capability of the fabrication process.

If you have heavy planes in the board, make sure they're distributed evenly
throughout the layers, otherwise any good PCB Fab worth his salt will keep
any bow and twist within the bounds of the usual specs. It used ot be that
the thicker the board was, the more rigid it was and the less inclined it
was to warping. These days, more than 20 mils bow or twist on a 63 mil
thick board measuring 9 x 6 inches is unusual.

Are you designing boards to be made to MIL-PRF-55110, to an IPC spec or to
something more commercial?

Pete Duncan




                    Colin Weber
                    <colin.weber@VARI        To:     [log in to unmask]
                    ANINC.COM>               cc:     (bcc: DUNCAN Peter/Asst Prin Engr/ST Aero/ST Group)
                    Sent by: TechNet         Subject:     [TN] Bow & Twist
                    <[log in to unmask]>


                    07/19/01 12:18 PM
                    Please respond to
                    "TechNet E-Mail
                    Forum."; Please
                    respond to Colin
                    Weber






Folks,

Is there a method of determining the maximum permissible size of two board
types?
a) A SMT PCB containing Fine pitch QFP devices
b) A SMT PCB containing PBGA 388pin 1.27mm pitch & Fine pitch QFPs

with respect to Bow and Twist.

I am interested in how the thickness of the board relates to maximum bow
and twist.
I'd like to determine this before I design the layout, rather than find out
it is wrong
after performing the tests of IPC-6012A,  IPC-TM-650 2.4.22.

Regards,

Colin Weber

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2