TECHNET Archives

July 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"<Peter George Duncan>" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:52:36 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (84 lines)
It rather depends on which ICT machine you are using. We are going to use
an HP machine whose preferred pad size is 0.050" with 0.075" spacing and a
clearance area around that for access by the test probes. We argued the pad
size down to 0.035" to maximise board real estate, but the  main danger of
going any lower than that size is false error readings.

If the pads are too small or too close together, or both, there is a risk
of the probes not contacting properly and returning open or even short
circuit failures where none actually exist. Check with your ICT test
machine manufacturer and/or your test jig vendor and make sure from them
that you understand why the smaller pad sizes could be a problem and what
it would mean to you in terms of false readings.

It may be that you can go to smaller pads, but the downside could be
greatly increased jig costs owing to the greater precision required of the
jig and of the probes. You will also find that tight tolerence probes have
to be replaced more often as they can tolerate less wear before replacement
than a less stringent requirement.

Hope this helps.

Pete Duncan




                    Michael Forrester
                    <michael.forrester@L        To:     [log in to unmask]
                    ECROY.COM>                  cc:     (bcc: DUNCAN Peter/Asst Prin Engr/ST Aero/ST Group)
                    Sent by: TechNet            Subject:     [TN] ICT Test Points
                    <[log in to unmask]>


                    07/16/01 09:14 PM
                    Please respond to
                    "TechNet E-Mail
                    Forum."; Please
                    respond to Michael
                    Forrester






Does anyone have any statistics on ICT reliability based on test point
size?
What I am looking for
is information on what am I giving up, other than cost, by going from a
.035
test pad to a .025 test pad.
Is there a reliability curve based on test point size?  Any help would be
appreciated.  Thank you.

Best Regards,

Michael Forrester
LeCroy Corp.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2