TECHNET Archives

June 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Orlowski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 4 Jun 2001 15:35:42 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Does anyone out there have a lead to any specific research or studies on
the effectiveness of manual inspection of PCBA's?  A crude rule-of-thumb
that we've often used is 80% (80% of actual defects are found by a single
inspection).  I know there's a ton of variables (PCBA complexity, component
technology, magnification, fatigue, etc...) but I would think someone would
have documented a thorough study sometime.  We've got a customer that's
demanding justification for our rule-of-thumb.

Also, can someone recommend a good ergonomics reference regarding manual
inspection?  Thanks in advance.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2