TECHNET Archives

May 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 1 May 2001 09:15:25 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Lou

Bad idea!
- Solder mask curing, in practice, is very variable.
- Flux removal, from board type to board type, is very variable
Good idea:
Do systematic tests on every board type and do your SPC on the results
of these, individually. On the instruments I used to make, we had a
separate file for each assembly and the SPC was automatic. Quite often,
we saw clients who had some board types trend up while simultaneously
other types trended down, even though the process was the same. This may
have been due to variations in bare boards, components, air quality or
possibly power voltage and, of course, human variations.

My advice is test all your board types, several times per day, if you
really want to do SPC.

Brian

Lou Hart wrote:
>
> TechNetters, I'm following up on a discussion we had some months back,
> regarding use of an Omegameter at the end of a cleaning operation for SPC.
>
> Our production manager asked if we could use a single, standard board, run
> it through the solder wave and cleaner, then test it in the omegameter,
> doing this at prescribed time intervals for SPC.  Let me make sure I'm
> clear:  this standard board would be one unit, that would be used
> repeatedly to check the cleaning operation.  Using the single, standard
> board would eliminate variablity from handling, board and material
> composition, and all the things that affect the omegameter reading.  The
> only variables (we speculate) would be in the solder wave and the cleaner,
> the latter of which we are wanting to control.
>
> What, if anything, is wrong with this idea?
>
> My understanding is that incompletely cured laminate can release ionic
> material.  Could there be any such problem with solder resist?
>
> Lou Hart
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2