TECHNET Archives

May 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Hamilton, Richard CLE 4454" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 2 May 2001 09:21:07 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
Bill,

As a user of Quad, only one machine, I am most interested in your comments.
I am aware of what is going on to some degree. The way I understand it
another company accused Quad of copying technology, I am sure as a user you
have received the letters from the legal system. They are in the process of
being bought by another company which is logistically supposed to make
'things' go away. I am not sure this is a real problem.

However, your comment about placement accuracy is peaking my interest. I
would be interested in knowing what machines you have and their age. We only
have one IIc on the floor and we seem to have some issues sometimes with the
placement accuracy as well as fiducial location. Like you I am not the
person most intimate with the day to day operation, but when problems
continue or get worse, guess who gets called!?

If you feel it appropriate, we can move any remaining email on this off the
TN

Richard Hamilton
Clemar Mfg. / Rain Bird
[log in to unmask]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mengers, William D. [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 6:09 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      [TN]
>
> Hi out there,
>
> Can anyone tell me what is going on with Quad Systems and give me an
> opinion
> about whether or not to invest in more Quad equipment at this point in
> time?
> We have three machines and quit a bit of fixturing so we are thinking that
> because of this large investment (by our standards) it would be difficult
> to
> go to another manufacturer's equipment.  But, if Quad is going down the
> tubes we will end up doing that anyway after having bought more equipment.
> We have a lot of trouble with placement accuracy and are not sure if this
> is
> the machines (is there something more dependable?) or something else we
> are
> doing wrong.  I am not the engineer directly involved in the, but I do
> know
> a little bit about the process.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> Thank you.
>
> Bill Mengers
> SMT Process Engineer
> Northrop Grumman Corp.
> Baltimore, Md.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
> Technet NOMAIL
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
> E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> ext.5315
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2