TECHNET Archives

May 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 24 May 2001 15:53:09 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (54 lines)
Dave

As you are probably aware, one unit is the reciprocal of the other. As a
rough guide, you can say that the ionic contaminants in your water are
roughly proportional to the conductivity, if you offset the minimum
value of 0.056 µS-cm (at 20°C). Practically, therefore, if your scale
is, say, 0 to 10 µS-cm, it is approximately linear to the contaminants.
On the other hand, if your resistivity scale is 0 to 20 Mohm-cm, your
most useful part will be non-linearly cramped up between, say, 10 and 18
Mohm-cm and a relatively large change in contaminants will result in a
small change in reading at the upper end. Go for conductivity, every
time.

Brian

Dave Abbott wrote:
>
> Hi Technet members
>
> I have a stencil and mis-print cleaner on-site which has a water
> purification circuit attached. It consists of a Carbon and a D.I. cylinder
> and I need to plumb in a meter for measuring the purified water. I have
> only ever used resistivity systems previously, but have now discovered
> conductivity meters. The only thing I have been told about them is that
> they can measure to a tighter degree than resistivity meters. If anybody
> can enlighten me unto which system would suit my application best, then it
> would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Dave Abbott
> Manufacturing Engineer
> Marconi Communications
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2