TECHNET Archives

May 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Pelchat, Janice" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Wed, 9 May 2001 05:43:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (87 lines)
I have found that the Class 2 length is typically the remaining length for
common through hole parts after insertion and solder.  Allowing the length
to remain without cutting (either in line with the wave or following hand
solder) eliminates MAJOR cost in terms of rework, touching up of fractured
solder, or having to maintain an inline cutter.

CAUTION:  Pure conjecture follows!
Our class 2 product is typically installed into systems that have less
chassis congestion - is it possible that the system design follows a
guideline as well relative to spacing of CCAs?  (That might be one reason).

The class 3 length brings back deja vu from military applications where it
was .06" max.

Jan Pelchat
Benchmark Electronics

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fullname [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 7:54 PM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Re: [TN] IPC-A-610 Rev C - Question about wire/lead
> protrusion
>
> Hi, Bob,
>
> You hit this question which I was about to check with IPC, too. Any reply
> from your guys at
> IPC? I am dying to know the rationale too, :)
>
> Regards - Wee Mei
>
> Bob Hawkins wrote:
>
> > Please reference Section 5.2.7.1 -  Table 5-2
> >
> > What is the rationale on the (L) max numbers for Class 2  (2.5mm) and
> Class
> > 3 (1.5mm) ???
> >
> > Bob Hawkins
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> > Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
> in
> > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> > To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
> Technet NOMAIL
> > Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases
> > E-mail Archives
> > Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional
> > information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> ext.5315
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
> Technet NOMAIL
> Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
> E-mail Archives
> Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
> additional
> information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
> ext.5315
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2