Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 18 May 2001 18:35:55 -0400 |
X-To: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kathy, I send samples to Kester and, from a measurement quality
perspective, I am not impressed with the tin numbers. For all I know, that
is a hard one to measure. For gold and copper, the other elements I look
at, the numbers look better. For the moment, I don't want to quantify my
preceding statements. Are these methods better for some elements than
others? I'm curious.
Lou Hart
-----Original Message-----
From: Kathy Kuhlow [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 5:31 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Solder Pot Analysis
What is the most reliable method of solder pot analysis? I know the
Keister uses the spark analysis and Alpha uses a wet chemistry method (I
think). What are the differences and which is more reliable?
TIA
Kathy
<< File: TEXT.htm >>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|