TECHNET Archives

April 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ian Hanna <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 13:11:29 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (227 lines)
There are about a dozen defects that can occur during drill resharpening
(repointing).  About half are major, the other half are not as important.
Most drill suppliers have a chart of one sort or another, some shops inspect
drills for these, all good repointing services do this.  Talk to your
supplier and or repoint center, if they can't help ask their competition.
This is a case where pictures are worth a thousand words.

Defects can affect hole-wall quality, tool life and positional accuracy on
small drills.
Remember that resharpening is really only a regrinding of the tip, the sides
of the cutter are not touched, and may dull through use.  This is not
normally an issue with FR-4, although more exotic materials, like PTFE for
example, are more sensitive.

Drill smear is removed through normal processes, there are a few in common
use such as permanganate and plasma, most multilayer shops perform this pro
forma, hence epoxy smear is almost never an issue these days.  Smear does
not cause a problem on double sided plated through holes as the plating will
always connect to the cladding at some point, it is only an issue where it
isolates connections to internal layers, which by their nature have a small
interface area with the PTH barrel.

Ian


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of <Peter George Duncan>
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 4:51 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] The standard bit inspection spec


Hi, again, Jay Ju,

Defects to the bits themselves shouldn't amount to more than insufficient
sharpness of edges, though incorrect angles are also not unknown. Ceramic
bits can be chipped as well, but I can't think of much else off hand. You
may get better answers from other Netters.

Regards
Pete





                    Young Hwan Ju
                    <yhju@SIMMTEC        To:     [log in to unmask]
                    H.CO.KR>             cc:
                    Sent by:             Subject:     Re: [TN] The standard
bit inspection spec
                    TechNet
                    <[log in to unmask]
                    ORG>


                    04/26/01
                    04:18 PM
                    Please
                    respond to
                    "TechNet
                    E-Mail
                    Forum.";
                    Please
                    respond to
                    yhju






 $)CThank you for your useful and prompt response.
Yes, Pete I am talking about drill bits for PCB fabrication.
And what I want to know is what kind of bit defect is likely to happen by
incorrect resharpening compared to new bit production.

Regards
Jay Ju

-----  H8<[GQ   ;g6w : YoungHwan Ju/SimmTech ( 2001-04-26 05:17 PM ) -----

                    peter.duncan@s  <v=E@N :        "TechNet E-Mail Forum."
<[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
                    t.com.sg        B|A6@N :
                                    A&8q :           Re: [TN] The standard
bit inspection spec
                    2001-04-26
                    04:56 PM






Hi, Jay Ju,

Are you talking about drill bits for PCB fabrication? If you are, I cannot
give you an inspection spec number, but major defects caused by incorrect
resharpening might include incorrect hole size and smearing of the hole
walls. Smearing will have to be cleaned up by reaming the holes prior to
plating or you will not achieve proper connection to inner layers, good
plating adhesion or even plating thickness.

If the bits are for a different application, please specify what it is.

Regards

Pete Duncan





                    Young Hwan Ju

                    <yhju@SIMMTEC        To:     [log in to unmask]

                    H.CO.KR>             cc:

                    Sent by:             Subject:     [TN] The standard bit
inspection spec
                    TechNet

                    <[log in to unmask]

                    ORG>



                    04/26/01

                    02:08 PM

                    Please

                    respond to

                    "TechNet

                    E-Mail

                    Forum.";

                    Please

                    respond to

                    yhju







Hi, all subscribers
In incoming inspection of  both new bit and resharpened bit, Can you make
me know the standard spec if anyone knows about that.
And I' would like to know the exclusive major defects caused by wrong bit
resharpening operation.

regards
Jay Ju

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----



Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for
additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2