TECHNET Archives

April 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Smith Russell PO US <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:24:42 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
        You should be able to re coat most of the photoimageable products on
the market on top of the existing mask .I would stay with the original type
for best compatibility.  It might take a little prep work to get superior
adhesion. (i.e. cleaning the surface) .If the second coat can be put on
thinner, then it  becomes a matter of registration to line up the second
image to the first, resolution should be better on the thinner coating
unless the coloring pigment effects it.   If you can  make the image for the
second exposure slightly oversize from the original, it will make it easier
to  register, and give you more room for misregistration, before you get
mask on pads.


        Russell Smith

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2