Interesting question is raised now: If a product contains a compound not
known to be hazardous, but it decomposes/transforms into a hazardous
material during the INTENDED use of the material, it is not required to list
such compounds on the MSDS? That's hard to believe.
Tim Reeves


|-----Original Message-----
|From: <Rudy Sedlak> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
|Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 6:36 AM
|Subject: Re: Hydrobromic vs. Hydrochloric.
|
|
|Brian:
|
|You use the term "permitted".
|
|You have to ask the question if anyone is admitting to having
|Hydrazine,
|because I am sure the rules cover "Hydrazine", not "Hydrazine
|Compounds", and
|Hydrazine Hydrobromide is officially not Hydrazine, inspite
|of the fact that
|it decomposes to Hydrazine during HAL.
|
|Rudy Sedlak
|

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------