Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:09:57 -0800 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
X-To: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi
Have you had a look under the BGA of the reflow quality on that perticular
ball, does it look nasty on the microscope; too much heat, or maybe this
ball has not enough heat. If the reflow on the bga is not even I would
sugest slowing down the profile and reducing the slope at spike. Give the
bga a better chance to reflow evenly. It is quite possible to have a ball
close or attached to ground sucking up the heat, or the opposite, a ball
that has a thermal stress on it.
Bob Perkins
SMT Manufacturing Process /
Automation Technician
Aimtronics-Delta
-----Original Message-----
From: Rudolph Yu [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 8:48 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] BGA crack- major headache
Here are the facts:
PBGA-272 balls
FR4 with HASL finishes 8 layers
The failure point always happens at the same I/O which is the 2nd last ball
of the top outmost row of the package. It is not located near the edge of
the board or any breakaway point.
Failure mode
Micro fracture found near the intermetallic layer between the BGA package
and the solder ball attached to it.
Around 0.001% of the products we built failed in the field because of this.
None of these were caught during the ICT or Functional test.
The same ASIC is also used on several other Products and have never seen an
issue like this. Somehow this failure mode with this ASIC only occurs in
one particular product /design.
The ASIC / fab lot-related , ICT pin interference, stress by the breakaway
tab, and stencil cleanliness assumptions had already ruled out after a
controlled lot was built few weeks back. All boards passed the tests. But
now some boards started failing in the field.
Why the crack always happen to one single location(ball) with the same
product we built??
We have run out all the possibilities that we can think of. I hope all the
experts in TechNet can share their opinions on this. Customer kept asking
for the root cause analysis. Right now we just cannot came up with a
reasonable one.
Thanks
Rudolph Yu
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET
Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700
ext.5315
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|