TECHNET Archives

February 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"<Rudy Sedlak>" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Fri, 2 Feb 2001 21:48:56 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
In a message dated 2/2/01 3:55:25 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> *       Have there been any incidences in the past where the system has been
>  left on during nitric passivation? In this case, the tank has been etched
>  and will not form a passive regardless of what is done to it unless it is
>  re-electropolished.

I would repectively disagree with the above.  It is my understanding that you
can passivate Stainless, as long as there is metal remaining.  Passivation
forms an insoluble oxide coat, mostly of Chromium.  If the surface has been
etched away, it is my understanding that the Nitric eats/etches until it gets
to a surface that it can passivate, and stops....and does the job.

Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical Company

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send the following message: SET Technet NOMAIL
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2